You are here:
- Home »
- Using evidence for learning »
- Working with data »
- Standards-based assessment
Standards-based assessment
Standards-based assessment relies on teachers making qualitative judgments about student’s learning.
Each standard has a number of components that students need to bring together to achieve. Teachers’ judgments are based on the work as a whole. The consistency of teacher judgments is improved through moderation. Moderation supports teachers to develop a shared understanding of the meaning of standards and how to apply them in a range of cases.
Differences between norm-referenced assessment, criterion-referenced assessment and standards-based assessment
Standards-based assessment shows what a student can do in relation to broad descriptions, supported by exemplars of expected achievement. The descriptions are broader than criteria. Each standard has a number of components that students need to bring together to achieve the standard.
Norm-referenced assessment shows how students are achieving compared with a statistical sample of others of an equivalent group at a given point in time. Such tests often provide results in percentiles or stanines.
Criterion-referenced assessment shows what students can or can’t do in relation to a specific list of tasks or skills. Teachers’ judgments are about whether the student has achieved each individual skill or task. When writing, for example, a student may be able to succeed at each task or skill but still not be able to write a compelling piece that meets the needs of an audience.
Standards-based assessment is consistent with the New Zealand educational emphasis on assessment for learning rather than assessment of learning (New Zealand Curriculum, 2007; Absolum et al, Directions for Assessment in New Zealand, 2009). The student takes a more active role in the learning, teaching and assessment cycle, creating a partnership between student and teacher. The clarity and transparency of assessment standards help teachers provide students with information of what they know and can do and, more importantly, a clear picture of what they need to do to improve so they can take charge of their own learning (Black & Wiliam, 1998; Crooks, 1988).
References
- Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand Curriculum. Learning Media Ltd.
- Black, P. & Wiliam, W. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in education: Principles, policy & practice, 5:1, 7-74, DOI: 10.1080/0969595980050102
- Crooks, T.J. (1998). The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Review of educational research (Winter 1988), Vol. 54, No. 4 pp 438–481
- Absolum, M. Flockton, L. Hattie, J. Hipkins, R. & Reid, I. (1988). Directions for assessment in New Zealand. Learning Media Ltd (PDF 505 KB)